|
Post by shred on Jun 1, 2013 9:42:28 GMT -5
Lies from him include: Seems like he's quite bonkers to me. forums.randi.org/showthread.php?t=145296Harrit's own website confirms that he has no relevant expertise in the understanding of structural fire engineering issues and he's just another dumbass conspiracy theorist peddling the usual mainstream urban myths as the rest of the 'truth' movement numpties. nielsharrit.org/
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 1, 2013 10:01:57 GMT -5
There ya go, true to form, back to attacking an expert. I knew you couldn't help yourself.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 1, 2013 11:44:24 GMT -5
He may be an expert in the field of photochemistry, but he's not an expert on anything relevant to 9/11 pal.
Man up and face the facts. Planes were HIJACKED by 19 Mujahideen. Four of those 19 men were trained pilots who had each earned a licence from the FAA. Four of those 19 men had training on official boeing simulators and had familiarity with airliner controls and knew how to set an auto pilot. They understood VFR flight and were competent enough to line up put speed on and crash these planes into buildings. The planes did mechanical damage. The fuel the planes carried set the office furnishings on fire. These fires burned at ~1000C. Steel weakened by 90% Steel gave way to load and load fell. Resistance from floors below caused some debris to be flung outwards (every action has an equal and opposite reaction) Debris from the twin towers hit WTC7. WTC7 took damage, caught fire and burned for 7 hours lost structural integrity and succumbed to load. Witnesses saw one of the hijacked planes hit the Pentagon. Eyewitnesses identified the plane that hit the Pentagon as a Boeing 757. Parts from the plane that hit the Pentagon match that of a Boeing 757. Scars on the Pentagon's walls match where the 757 wings hit. Passengers on the hijacked planes contacted people on the ground including loved ones. The hijackers had mace and knives. Flight crew were stabbed. Pilots were killed in their cockpits. Passengers from Flight 93 contacted their loved ones. Loved ones of Flight 93 remember their last words.
It was an outside job Bob.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 1, 2013 13:33:23 GMT -5
I'm bumping this so the important points proving that Niels Holger Harrit is a numpty aren't lost.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 1, 2013 14:09:11 GMT -5
I'm bumping this so the important points proving that Niels Holger Harrit is a numpty aren't lost. Are you that scared of Dr. Niels Harrit that you have to start a new thread attacking him? If you were genuine and you were really confident in your bulls**t then you would have no need to resort to attacking those you don't agree with, it would stand up on its merits. It's just more evidence of your fakery.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 1, 2013 14:19:21 GMT -5
I'm not scared of him at all. Him and his gang of frauds would be highly amusing if it wasn't for the fact they're trying to excuse the terrorists who attacked your country and murdered nearly 3000 people.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 1, 2013 18:06:39 GMT -5
I'm not scared of him at all. Him and his gang of frauds would be highly amusing if it wasn't for the fact they're trying to excuse the terrorists who attacked your country and murdered nearly 3000 people. Your fear (or more likely desperation) shows through your posts. You think Niels Harrit is a notorious gang leader too? I think you're highly amusing but even more pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 2, 2013 1:46:32 GMT -5
I'm not bloody afraid. You're afraid cos I'm right and all your stupid numpty has found is RUST and you've wasted years of your life on a wild goose chase by listening to liars like him. www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 2, 2013 8:55:16 GMT -5
It says at the bottom of the article: "Thanks to Shagster, ScottS and David B. Benson for their research."Shagster, now there's someone everyone holds as a supreme expert and ScottS and David B. Benson, everyone knows who these people are, after all, their credentials and their other work are listed ... oh wait, they're not. I tried to find David B. Benson since he's the only one who gives his full name. So which one of these did the research? [ www.google.com/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=david+b.+benson&oq=david+b.+benson&gs_l=hp.12..0.4328.4328.0.6422.1.1.0.0.0.0.89.89.1.1.0...0.0...1c.2.15.psy-ab.p2WnFPaiqC4&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.47244034,d.dmQ&fp=c9d97f49e507a36a&biw=1920&bih=956 ] The link above won't work, so just google "David B. Benson" if you want to. According to Google. he's either an Emeritus Professor of EE and Computer Science at Washington State University or possibly a doctor, a general practitioner from the state of Washington. So what do either of these 2 backgrounds have to do with the article you posted? The other 2 are anonymous since they're afraid to provide their full names. But you believe these anonymous people are the genuine article but not over 2,000 credentialed experts, some of them known world-wide, those all belong to a notorious gang of "so-called" experts. And of course, it all comes from the absolute best site on the internet, a "debunking" site that doesn't have one single article criticizing anything about the official 9/11 story, not even the free fall of WTC7 or the admitted lies of the 9/11 Commission. And since I assume you're trying to contradict the nano-thermite findings, what does the article have to do with those findings? How does it contradict what they found, or does it? And another question, why would these people choose to be anonymous? 3 anonymous people did the research but did any of these 3 write that or did they just copy that information from their "research" and if that's the case, who actually wrote that? These are just a few observations I'm sure you didn't bother to check out because you believe that somehow it fits your agenda.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 3, 2013 4:26:00 GMT -5
LOL stop trying to make out that Rust = deliberately planted Thermite = inside job. Your fraudulent movement has been exposed.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 3, 2013 7:24:27 GMT -5
LOL stop trying to make out that Rust = deliberately planted Thermite = inside job. Your fraudulent movement has been exposed. Yeah fake one, good answer to my questions. The only fraud that's been exposed is you, over and over again.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 3, 2013 8:06:42 GMT -5
You're the one posting doctored videos mate I'm simply exposing your movement's lies.
You have never answered how a demolitions team could access a fully working office building, perform the extremely complicated job of rigging it for demolitions in the precise floors at which an airliner was set to crash without anyone in the offices noticing as their walls were stripped out and columns pre cut. You've never answered how once rigged these demolitions charges could survive the impact of an airliner and remain unaffected for an hour by the 1000 degrees C temperatures from widespread office fires. You've never answered how WTC 7 could have been rigged for demolition or how a rigged building could survive the impact of heavy debris from another building and extensive fire without the demolition charges going off prematurely ? You've never answered how WTC7 could have survived the structural damage and fire raging in it at all, you've just parroted a load of urban myths from the 9/11 troof movement. You've never given a convincing answer as to why your troofer heroes won't have their theories peer reviewed in a real science journal. You've never accepted you were wrong about the Pentagon despite all the forensic evidence and eyewitness evidence that proves you wrong.
For you this isn't about the victims of 9/11, it's about your ego. Your pride will not let you admit your mistakes. How many years of your life have you wasted on your wild goose chase eh ? What has the 9/11 'truth' movement actually done ? If their 'evidence' is as good as you say, why haven't they initiated legal proceedings to prosecute those they allege were responsible ?
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Jun 3, 2013 8:53:10 GMT -5
Another good answer fake one, your typical assortment of fabrications, straw man questions and deflections. Try again if you care to, only this time, unless you have new material worth discussing, or you actually want to answer my questions, I'm not going to waste my time.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Jun 3, 2013 9:38:57 GMT -5
You're the one fabricating things Bob. You're the one who posted a doctored WTC7 video as 'evidence'. LOL.
I'm simply exposing your movement's lies. You're ducking and diving and ignoring the important questions.
Why are you afraid of answering these questions ?
You have never answered how a demolitions team could access a fully working office building, perform the extremely complicated job of rigging it for demolitions in the precise floors at which an airliner was set to crash without anyone in the offices noticing as their walls were stripped out and columns pre cut.
You've never answered how once rigged these demolitions charges could survive the impact of an airliner and remain unaffected for an hour by the 1000 degrees C temperatures from widespread office fires.
You've never answered how WTC 7 could have been rigged for demolition or how a rigged building could survive the impact of heavy debris from another building and extensive fire without the demolition charges going off prematurely ?
You've never answered how WTC7 could have survived the structural damage and fire raging in it at all, you've just parroted a load of urban myths from the 9/11 troof movement.
You've never given a convincing answer as to why your troofer heroes won't have their theories peer reviewed in a real science journal.
You've never accepted you were wrong about the Pentagon despite all the forensic evidence and eyewitness evidence that proves you wrong.
How many years of your life have you wasted on your wild goose chase eh ?
What has the 9/11 'truth' movement actually done ?
If their 'evidence' is as good as you say, why haven't they initiated legal proceedings to prosecute those they allege were responsible ?
|
|