|
Post by bob0627 on May 24, 2013 10:05:39 GMT -5
An excellent presentation by Jonathan Cole:
|
|
|
Post by shred on May 24, 2013 10:43:19 GMT -5
No it isn't it's ridiculous absurdist nonesense.
There's no evidence of controlled demolitions. There's no RDX residues no det cord remnants no blasting cap remnants so they fabricated a story about demolition by thermite knowing that the buildings were made of thermite precursors and that people like you would keep supporting them.
Thermite does not blast and so would not be able to instantly shear columns and 'freefall' would not happen.
Jonathan Cole ignores the effects of fire upon steel and contends that the only way it could weaken is if it reaches molten state. The man's BARMY.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on May 24, 2013 10:47:18 GMT -5
You are so predictable. The video speaks for itself, what Jonathan Cole says is impossible is indeed impossible, what you pretend to believe is impossible unfortunately is not only very possible it's also highly probable.
|
|
|
Post by shred on May 24, 2013 10:55:29 GMT -5
The video is utter crap mate. What Jonathan Cole says is twaddle. He's barmy.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on May 24, 2013 11:37:36 GMT -5
The video is utter crap mate. What Jonathan Cole says is twaddle. He's barmy. I'm overwhelmed by the amount of evidence you posted that shows it's "crap" and "twaddle" and that he's "barmy". I guess when you have nothing, you can always resort to these illustrious terms and name-calling. Your fakery is well noted.
|
|
|
Post by shred on May 25, 2013 10:44:49 GMT -5
I've already posted the evidence showing extensive fire in WTC7, showing metallurgical samples from WTC7 that confirm exposure to ~1000C fire temperatures. I've already posted firefighter testimonies, fire photographs from WTC7 and footage of it's collapse that prove that explosives did not bring it down.
Thermites are not used in controlled demolitions. They never have been, not even nanothermites.
There's also the issue of quantity, how much thermite it takes to even melt through the engine of a Peugeot 205
It's a very inefficient and messy reaction.
And this nanothermite reaction test (sponsored by conspiracy theorist Jesse Ventura) was a complete and utter failure:
The thermite theories are complete and utter tripe mate.
Custom made high explosives could in principle bring down such buildings but the charges would be very very big and very very loud, so loud the explosions would be heard for miles around.
When UK Coal demolished the pit head at Riccall Colliery I heard the blast from two miles away.
There are ways to implode buildings without explosives though.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on May 25, 2013 11:00:32 GMT -5
Once again posting the irrelevant as well as your antagonistic opinion to try to advance your agenda. Nothing you posted changes anything in the video by Jonathan Cole. But if it educates and matters to someone then it has some value.
|
|