|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 8:02:01 GMT -5
Welcome To Earth! It Has Been 6935 Days And Counting Since We Had Any Global Warming!
Written by John Hayward, The Conversation on 03 September 2014.
If you've got children heading off to college this fall, congratulations - they have lived their entire lives in a world without global warming, a fact that stands in absolute and total defiance of the phony computer models that predicted we'd be watching penguins float through the flooded streets of Miami on melting ice floes by now.
The Church of Global Warming originally pretended the "pause" didn't exist, then conjured up some new computer models that claimed it would end within a year or two. According to a new paper by Dr. Ross McKittrick, courtesy of Watts Up With That?, we're now into Year 19 of the "pause" with no end in sight. (It's probably been even longer since any warming was experienced in the lower atmosphere.)
Speaking of those Miami-bound penguins, the great alarmist image of the climate-change racket, polar ice melting and flooding the coastal regions of the world, shows no signs of occurring, even though the much-ballyhooed Eighties and Nineties models said the process should have been well under way by now. Antarctic ice coverage is way up, even though it was supposed to be dramatically reduced by now.
Undaunted, the Church of Global Warming just issues ever-more dire predictions, floats fanciful explanations for why the doomsday models politicians employed to bludgeon trillions out of the world economy were so utterly inaccurate, and devotes itself to staging elaborate media spectacles. There is simply no question, for anyone following the actual science, that the core theories of man-made climate apocalypse have been shattered. If anything, we're looking at natural regional processes, a vast and complex system adjusting itself in response to stimuli far more powerful than anything human industry has produced.
I doubt very many people want to stop studying the climate, but that's never been the issue on the table. The issue is political control of the world's economies based on alarmist predictions and outright fraud. It's past time for the global warming scare to end, decisively. The old hypotheses failed upon contact with data. Science dictates the formation of new hypotheses. Politics demands the alteration of the data to fit pre-ordained outcomes.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 8:22:25 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is only a part of the globe. Even that has continued to warm, but at a slower rate that the oceans. I've posted all of this before. Your author is woefully ignorant of the details.
I second that. Hopefully they don't wash out like their parents did in high school.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:18:30 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is only a part of the globe. Even that has continued to warm, but at a slower rate that the oceans. I've posted all of this before. Your author is woefully ignorant of the details. I second that. Hopefully they don't wash out like their parents did in high school. How do you wash out of high school? They don't kick you out of public school for low grades they make you go to summer school.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 11:22:12 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is only a part of the globe. Even that has continued to warm, but at a slower rate that the oceans. I've posted all of this before. Your author is woefully ignorant of the details. I second that. Hopefully they don't wash out like their parents did in high school. How do you wash out of high school? They don't kick you out of public school for low grades they make you go to summer school. By quitting because you can't hack it. Duh! Even if that wasn't clear, surely you've seen An Officer and Gentleman?
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:30:38 GMT -5
How do you wash out of high school? They don't kick you out of public school for low grades they make you go to summer school. By quitting because you can't hack it. Duh! Even if that wasn't clear, surely you've seen An Officer and Gentleman? lol high school is not like military training where you can drop out or be kiked out washing out is being kicked out. College is a much better analogy.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 11:36:59 GMT -5
By quitting because you can't hack it. Duh! Even if that wasn't clear, surely you've seen An Officer and Gentleman? lol high school is not like military training where you can drop out or be kiked out washing out is being kicked out. College is a much better analogy. Well except that you can drop out. If you can't then why does Detroit Public Schools have dropout rate of almost 20%? Washing out is quitting. That's what Sgt. Foley was pushing for. he didn't kick them out, he pushed them to quit and called it "washing out." High school works better for the insult. You're too literal all the time.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:40:27 GMT -5
lol high school is not like military training where you can drop out or be kiked out washing out is being kicked out. College is a much better analogy. Well except that you can drop out. If you can't then why does Detroit Public Schools have dropout rate of almost 20%? Washing out is quitting. That's what Sgt. Foley was pushing for. he didn't kick them out, he pushed them to quit and called it "washing out." High school works better for the insult. You're too literal all the time. DOR except Mayo wouldn't quit so he was going to kick him out until he cried . They also kick you out if you failed the physics classes or any part of the physical training.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 11:47:18 GMT -5
Well except that you can drop out. If you can't then why does Detroit Public Schools have dropout rate of almost 20%? Washing out is quitting. That's what Sgt. Foley was pushing for. he didn't kick them out, he pushed them to quit and called it "washing out." High school works better for the insult. You're too literal all the time. DOR except Mayo wouldn't quit so he was going to kick him out until he cried . They also kick you out if you failed the physics classes or any part of the physical training. Yes, but that's not washing out. The phrase was used for quitting.
|
|
|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 11:54:08 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is only a part of the globe. Even that has continued to warm, but at a slower rate that the oceans. I've posted all of this before. Your author is woefully ignorant of the details. I second that. Hopefully they don't wash out like their parents did in high school. The lower troposphere is that part of the atmosphere which "global warming theory" says should be warming - it's not.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:55:02 GMT -5
DOR except Mayo wouldn't quit so he was going to kick him out until he cried . They also kick you out if you failed the physics classes or any part of the physical training. Yes, but that's not washing out. The phrase was used for quitting. wash·out (wshout, wôsh-) n. 2. b. One who fails to measure up to a standard, especially one who fails a course of training or study.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:02:48 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is only a part of the globe. Even that has continued to warm, but at a slower rate that the oceans. I've posted all of this before. Your author is woefully ignorant of the details. I second that. Hopefully they don't wash out like their parents did in high school. The lower troposphere is that part of the atmosphere which "global warming theory" says should be warming - it's not. That's the portion of the atmosphere that science has shown warms less than the oceans.
|
|
|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 12:04:44 GMT -5
The lower troposphere is that part of the atmosphere which "global warming theory" says should be warming - it's not. That's the portion of the atmosphere that science has shown warms less than the oceans. "Updated science" - which is what you guys do each time one part of the original "theory" and accompanying predictions falls flat...
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:08:03 GMT -5
Yes, but that's not washing out. The phrase was used for quitting. wash·out (wshout, wôsh-) n. 2. b. One who fails to measure up to a standard, especially one who fails a course of training or study. the phrase was used in the movie for quitting. My goodness you are a relentless nitpicker. How does this matter anyways? lmao
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:08:46 GMT -5
That's the portion of the atmosphere that science has shown warms less than the oceans. "Updated science" - which is what you guys do each time one part of the original "theory" and accompanying predictions falls flat... Yes, well I'm sure science would be better if it were stagnant. lmao
|
|
|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 12:13:51 GMT -5
"Updated science" - which is what you guys do each time one part of the original "theory" and accompanying predictions falls flat... Yes, well I'm sure science would be better if it were stagnant. lmao So, you're not able to see where Science's credibility is damaged in any way? "The evidence for global warming has been building steadily on a number of fronts for decades. But many questions remain. Until recently one of the more troublesome ones was the disagreement between tropospheric temperature measurements made since 1979 by NOAA satellites carrying Microwave Sounding Unit equipment, and the atmospheric temperature predictions of the best general circulation models. These satellites measure the brightness temperature of the lower atmosphere (that is, the temperature that corresponds to its total radiation emissions, most of which are at microwave frequencies). The best of state-of-the-art general circulation models of the earth/atmosphere system have consistently predicted that the lower to middle troposphere (the first 7 to 10 km above the earth's surface) should be warming at equal or greater rates than the surface. But for over two decades the expected degree of warming in this layer was not observed in these brightness temperature datasets. Attempts to independently validate these measurements with direct thermometer measurements by weather balloon borne radiosonde packages produced results that were also lower than expected in many regions."
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:16:31 GMT -5
Yes, well I'm sure science would be better if it were stagnant. lmao So, you're not able to see where Science's credibility is damaged in any way? "The evidence for global warming has been building steadily on a number of fronts for decades. But many questions remain. Until recently one of the more troublesome ones was the disagreement between tropospheric temperature measurements made since 1979 by NOAA satellites carrying Microwave Sounding Unit equipment, and the atmospheric temperature predictions of the best general circulation models. These satellites measure the brightness temperature of the lower atmosphere (that is, the temperature that corresponds to its total radiation emissions, most of which are at microwave frequencies). The best of state-of-the-art general circulation models of the earth/atmosphere system have consistently predicted that the lower to middle troposphere (the first 7 to 10 km above the earth's surface) should be warming at equal or greater rates than the surface. But for over two decades the expected degree of warming in this layer was not observed in these brightness temperature datasets. Attempts to independently validate these measurements with direct thermometer measurements by weather balloon borne radiosonde packages produced results that were also lower than expected in many regions." No, I see us learning more and more about our palnet. aibafs.com/thread/26820/cause-global-warming-hiatus-atlantic
|
|
|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 12:18:42 GMT -5
So, you're not able to see where Science's credibility is damaged in any way? "The evidence for global warming has been building steadily on a number of fronts for decades. But many questions remain. Until recently one of the more troublesome ones was the disagreement between tropospheric temperature measurements made since 1979 by NOAA satellites carrying Microwave Sounding Unit equipment, and the atmospheric temperature predictions of the best general circulation models. These satellites measure the brightness temperature of the lower atmosphere (that is, the temperature that corresponds to its total radiation emissions, most of which are at microwave frequencies). The best of state-of-the-art general circulation models of the earth/atmosphere system have consistently predicted that the lower to middle troposphere (the first 7 to 10 km above the earth's surface) should be warming at equal or greater rates than the surface. But for over two decades the expected degree of warming in this layer was not observed in these brightness temperature datasets. Attempts to independently validate these measurements with direct thermometer measurements by weather balloon borne radiosonde packages produced results that were also lower than expected in many regions." No, I see us learning more and more about our palnet. aibafs.com/thread/26820/cause-global-warming-hiatus-atlanticWell when you've learned enough to make reliable predictions, THEN predict catastrophe - is that too much to ask?
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:21:18 GMT -5
Well when you've learned enough to make reliable predictions, THEN predict catastrophe - is that too much to ask? Scientists don't make predictions. That's left up to you religious nuts and phony psychics. Scientists calculate likelihoods. Again you demonstrate why you WASHED OUT of high school and would never survive in the scientific community.
|
|
|
Post by beauregarde on Sept 5, 2014 12:23:13 GMT -5
Well when you've learned enough to make reliable predictions, THEN predict catastrophe - is that too much to ask? Scientists don't make predictions. That's left up to you religious nuts and phony psychics. Scientists calculate likelihoods. Again you demonstrate why you WASHED OUT of high school and would never survive in the scientific community. "Scientists don't make predictions." Stunning. So what's the IPCC all about?
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 12:33:13 GMT -5
Scientists don't make predictions. That's left up to you religious nuts and phony psychics. Scientists calculate likelihoods. Again you demonstrate why you WASHED OUT of high school and would never survive in the scientific community. "Scientists don't make predictions." Stunning. So what's the IPCC all about? Assessing the scientific, technical and socio-economic information relevant for the understanding of the risk of human-induced climate change.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 13:16:45 GMT -5
wash·out (wshout, wôsh-) n. 2. b. One who fails to measure up to a standard, especially one who fails a course of training or study. the phrase was used in the movie for quitting. My goodness you are a relentless nitpicker. How does this matter anyways? lmao You just can't be wrong. lol
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 13:29:00 GMT -5
the phrase was used in the movie for quitting. My goodness you are a relentless nitpicker. How does this matter anyways? lmao You just can't be wrong. lol I can be, but I'm not on this. wash·out noun \ˈwȯsh-ˌau̇t, ˈwäsh-\ : a complete failure In the movie, the point was to get them to quit or what the Sergeant called "washout." well, you took us there again.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 14:08:11 GMT -5
You just can't be wrong. lol I can be, but I'm not on this. wash·out noun \ˈwȯsh-ˌau̇t, ˈw%$&@sh-\ : a complete failure In the movie, the point was to get them to quit or what the Sergeant called "washout." well, you took us there again. Not even close to going there. Just a simple disagreement on semantics.
|
|