|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2013 15:13:12 GMT -5
AND WHEN HE WAS SENATOR, HE VOTED TO FUND IT EACH YEAR. GET SOME BRAINS. Voting to fund troops who are already in harms way is in no way the same as voting to put them in harms war in the first place.
|
|
|
Post by thelion on Mar 6, 2013 18:25:17 GMT -5
The so-called "Iraq War Resolution" October 2, 2002. The Afghanistan war started even earlier - 2001, in response to Guess What? Obama was not a US Senator until 2005. Go gintzu yourself, nutsosaki. AND WHEN HE WAS SENATOR, HE VOTED TO FUND IT EACH YEAR. GET SOME BRAINS. You do understand the difference, of course - which means you're simply playing stupid.
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 6, 2013 19:20:10 GMT -5
He didn't vote for the Iraq war. He was still in the state senate voting "present". Really? Really. You think the Iraq war was started in 2005? If you want to attack his votes for funding troops already in the field then you go right ahead, but you don't get to pretend he voted for a war that was voted on while he was in the state senate voting "present".
|
|
|
Post by barrysoetoro847 on Mar 6, 2013 19:24:19 GMT -5
Take a look at the explosion in the debt between 2000 and 2008. Don't tell me there was no carryover spending from the disaster these people created, two unpaid wars, bank bailouts, GM, Chrysler bailouts, unpaid prescription plan, and unpaid tax cuts for 12 years. www.skymachines.com/US-National-Debt-Per-Capita-Percent-of-GDP-and-by-Presidental-Term.htmThese $%#$@ing morons want eveyone to believe that Obama created this problem. You're not fooling anyone repugs. This is your mess. The end is coming for you GOP. Good riddence! Obama debt good, Bush debt bad. I don't get it.
|
|
|
Post by barrysoetoro847 on Mar 6, 2013 19:26:57 GMT -5
Saddam didn't cooperate and wanted the war. Wrong on both points. Saddam did cooperate, it was Bush who pulled the inspectors out early so he could start his invasion before spring. NO, HE DIDN'T!!! THE U.N. SAID HE WAS IN VIOLATION! QUIT REWRITING HISTORY!Yes, the "coalition of the billing". What would we ever have done without those five soldiers from Uganda? AND BRITAIN, POLAND, CZECHOSLOVAKIA, AND MANY OTHER NATIONS. WE DID WE, AND YOUR BUDDY SADDAM LOSTBlatant lie, since neither is bankrupt. And don't try to hand me any B.S. predictions about years from now. YOU'VE GOT MENTAL PROBLEMS. NEITHER BANKRUPT, WHAT A ....Since when do state senators vote for wars? THEY VOTE TO FUND THEM DURING THE YEARLY BUDGETS, DID YOU NOT WATCH THE CLIP?MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE REPORTED IT A FORGERYYeah, so is Donald Trump's.
|
|
|
Post by barrysoetoro847 on Mar 6, 2013 19:27:35 GMT -5
AND WHEN HE WAS SENATOR, HE VOTED TO FUND IT EACH YEAR. GET SOME BRAINS. Voting to fund troops who are already in harms way is in no way the same as voting to put them in harms war in the first place. THEN WHY DIDN'T HE VOTE NO INSTEAD OF YES?!?!? YOU DRANK THE KOOL AID ON LISTENING TO HIS EXCUSES.
|
|
|
Post by barrysoetoro847 on Mar 6, 2013 19:28:37 GMT -5
Security Council 4644th Meeting (AM)
SECURITY COUNCIL HOLDS IRAQ IN ‘MATERIAL BREACH’ OF DISARMAMENT OBLIGATIONS, OFFERS FINAL CHANCE TO COMPLY, UNANIMOUSLY ADOPTING RESOLUTION 1441 (2002)
Instructs Weapons Inspections to Resume within 45 Days, Recalls Repeated Warning of ‘Serious Consequences’ for Continued Violations
Holding Iraq in “material breach” of its obligations under previous resolutions, the Security Council this morning decided to afford it a “final opportunity to comply” with its disarmament obligations, while setting up an enhanced inspection regime for full and verified completion of the disarmament process established by resolution 687 (1991).
|
|
|
Post by barrysoetoro847 on Mar 6, 2013 19:29:19 GMT -5
"I'm here to speak in support of the resolution before us, which I cosponsored. I believe we must vote for this resolution not because we want war, but because the national security of our country requires action.", John Edwards, Oct. ‘02
"I will be voting to give the President authority to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security." Sen. John F. Kerry,2002.
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weap ons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons." Sen. Hillary Clinton, Oct 10, 2002.
"Others Have Talked About This Threat That Is Posed By Saddam Hussein. Yes, He Has Chemical Weapons, He Has Biological Weapons, He Is Trying To Get Nuclear Weapons." Rep. Nancy Pelosi, 10/10/02
|
|