|
Post by shred on Sept 11, 2013 13:44:36 GMT -5
Basically Bob, you and your ilk have been conned. Your movement will never achieve it's aims as it's claims are a lie. All you people are doing is lining the pockets of Richard Gage and his mob and providing the fraudsters with a meal ticket, their scams haven't conned enough people so he's invested some of his scam money into advertising for more cash to keep his lavish lifestyle going.
The world trade centre wasn't taken down by controlled demolition, the clues lie in the planes that damaged the twin towers and weakened the steelwork.
Steel weakens at just 300 C, fires reached peaks of 1100C, a lot people above the impact zones jumped knowing they wouldn't get out alive. If as the 9/11 'truth' idiots allege there had been just a few small fires, people wouldn't have jumped to their deaths.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 11, 2013 13:47:46 GMT -5
Basically Bob, you and your ilk have been conned. Your movement will never achieve it's aims as it's claims are a lie. All you people are doing is lining the pockets of Richard Gage and his mob and providing the fraudsters with a meal ticket, their scams haven't conned enough people so he's invested some of his scam money into advertising for more cash to keep his lavish lifestyle going. The world trade centre wasn't taken down by controlled demolition, the clues lie in the planes that damaged the twin towers and weakened the steelwork. Steel weakens at just 300 C, fires reached peaks of 1100C, a lot people above the impact zones jumped knowing they wouldn't get out alive. If as the 9/11 'truth' idiots allege there had been just a few small fires, people wouldn't have jumped to their deaths. So then why are you so terrified about this?
|
|
|
Post by shred on Sept 13, 2013 4:32:40 GMT -5
I'm not terrified about this. I'm just trying to help you stop wasting your life on a pathetic wild goose chase brought about by the fraudsters who have conned you.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 13, 2013 7:22:14 GMT -5
I'm not terrified about this. I'm just trying to help you stop wasting your life on a pathetic wild goose chase brought about by the fraudsters who have conned you. I'm so grateful and you are so full of s**t ... as always.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Sept 13, 2013 13:26:11 GMT -5
You're the one lying about 9/11 day in day out not me pal.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 13, 2013 14:24:37 GMT -5
You're the one lying about 9/11 day in day out not me pal. Then I suggest you ignore my "lies".
|
|
|
Post by shred on Sept 19, 2013 6:22:43 GMT -5
No chance, your lies deserve to countered with the facts.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 19, 2013 7:15:05 GMT -5
"your lies deserve to countered with the facts."
Name calling, character assassination, fabrications and anonymous "debunker" opinions are NOT facts.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Sept 19, 2013 11:08:04 GMT -5
?? You're a right one for name calling, character assassination, fabrications and opinions. I've yet to see you post something wholly truthful about 9/11. I've caught you telling many lies and posting fabrications.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 19, 2013 12:13:54 GMT -5
"I've yet to see you post something wholly truthful about 9/11."
Everything I posted about 9/11 is FACT. Just because you only want to go along with the official narrative and reject anything that might contradict it does not mean I never posted anything truthful. In FACT, I even posted theories from your favorite "debunkers", so even those are true because the audio from the videos of the "debunkers" show the words coming out of their own mouths. I also posted links to the NIST Reports and the 9/11 Commission Report and quoted parts from both of those as well as their members. I posted literally hundreds of photos and videos containing all sorts of 9/11 issues, including captured events and eyewitness testimony. So obviously you're making this up as you always make things up.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Sept 19, 2013 14:44:12 GMT -5
Nothing you've posted about 9/11 is wholly fact. You post lies half truths and misrepresentations, you claimed that photographs of flight 77's exit hole into the pentagon courtyard was an entry hole, you claimed WTC7 had just a few small fires, you claimed that the building was destroyed by controlled demolitions, you claimed that thermites are used in controlled demolitions.
Wake up.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Sept 19, 2013 15:41:16 GMT -5
"you claimed that photographs of flight 77's exit hole into the pentagon courtyard was an entry hole"
I did post one photo of the last hole that was penetrated at the Pentagon which I initially thought was the first hole and I did subsequently show the actual entry hole. My mistake. I'm not above admitting my mistake. Either way, both holes make it highly dubious that the official narrative is correct as to what created them.
"you claimed WTC7 had just a few small fires"
The photos and videos show fires restricted to just portions of a few floors. That's irrefutable. There is no photo or video that shows any inferno as you have often claimed. Every video that shows the WTC7 collapse shows little or no fire. That's also irrefutable just from visual observation. Your claim that it was an "inferno" is based on a photo that shows a lot of smoke on one side of WTC7 but no fire. Anyone with any amount of intelligence knows that you can have smoke with little or no fire. An inferno would obviously show mostly fire and likely on all sides of the building.
"you claimed that the building was destroyed by controlled demolitions"
I never made that claim. Others have because the facts and logic support it. I said all 3 buildings experienced unnatural collapses (or disintegration with WTC1 and WTC2). And there's only one possible way known as to how that could have been achieved. The unnatural collapses are irrefutable just from observation of the videos. They are further supported upon closer examination. The collapses were all global, symmetrical, at accelerated velocities, at free fall and near free fall and through the path of greatest resistance. No building has ever collapsed in that manner either before or after 9/11 other than those that were control demolished. The laws of physics just does not support collapses or disintegration of buildings in that manner, in fact they contradict it. That's just very basic science that any high school student can understand.
"you claimed that thermites are used in controlled demolitions."
I never made that claim anywhere. I posted that an abundant amount of nano-thermite was found in reacted and unreacted form in 4 independent WTC dust samples. I also posted one or more videos that demonstrate how ignited thermite (not nano-thermite) reacts with steel. I didn't make any of this up since I never worked with thermite or nano-thermite. Whatever claims I posted on the subject comes from experts, not from me.
I have no reason to believe these are fake. There is no reason why anyone would want to fake any of it. There is NO MOTIVE that makes sense. On the other hand, there is ample reason to believe the official narrative is fake. The motivation to create a false narrative is historically self-evident, not to mention it's been proven to be false beyond the shadow of any doubt.
You want to call be a liar? Who cares, it means zero to me. I have no reason to lie about 9/11. Why on earth would I want to? If I make a mistake, I can admit to it and did. It changes nothing about what happened on 9/11 or the FACT that government and the complicit media and fakers such as yourself want to maintain an impossible narrative. In the case of government, its reason is obvious. In your case, yours is not so you must have some sort of agenda or you just have a maniacal ego issue.
|
|