|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 21, 2013 22:57:31 GMT -5
That's really an incredible stretch. She is not in a courtroom defending herself from personally being charged with a crime. She's a public SERVANT who does NOT have any constitutionally protected rights in her capacity as a tax paid state actor. By not answering questions in a Congressional inquiry, she is in fact committing the crime of failing to disclose information that belongs to the public domain. But they will let her get away with her crime and accept her unconstitutional position because the Constitution does not apply to the criminals in Washington. It is to my understanding that the Constitution protects everyone. Even criminals.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 20, 2013 11:25:00 GMT -5
IT was my understanding that open attacks and deliberate postings that lead to board wars were to be removed from this board and people would not post in this manner "How dare you quote Mac like that... she's a conservative, and conservatives are note to be held responsible for what they say, or do.. Read more: aibafs.freeforums.net/thread/4949/noticed?page=3#ixzz2Tqk3b0oeI guess when you are a Board MOD you are allowed to alter the rules to suit your pleasure and support another rule breaker like Brookboy. This was to be a new board with new rules and a clean slate. Then report it. Let the MODs deal with it.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 22:46:31 GMT -5
I will take that as a no. You can take whatever you want Chek. If you don't think the out of wedlock birthrate for blacks is in the high 70th percentile, then don't believe it. It really doesn't matter to me. The burden of proof is on you.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 22:13:14 GMT -5
And of course you don't have anything backing up any of your asinine statements. Read some history Chek, that's all I can advise. I will take that as a no.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 21:54:59 GMT -5
MFK: 77% of black children are bastards, what do YOU think is going on? My god, are you people SO afraid to speak the truth that you would rather see the country our parents built completely destroyed? Read more: aibafs.freeforums.net/thread/4923/conversation-june?page=5#ixzz2TnJaHuu8This country was built by the original immigrants, from all countries ... including the involuntary black slaves, Asian slaves, the indentured whites, Native Americans ... some of my ancestors were in this country long before it was the United States or even a British colony. Fantacize all you want and wallow in your infantile egalitarianism, but history is clear: ONE PEOPLE built the world's most advanced, creative, and enduring civilization. And of course you don't have anything backing up any of your asinine statements.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 20:59:41 GMT -5
So you think the poor all sling crack and have bastard babies? That's a messed up world view there. It's ben my experience that it is one shared by those that have done nothing to help their community through volunteer work to help the less fortunate. Naivety can have that effect. 77% of black children are bastards, what do YOU think is going on? My god, are you people SO afraid to speak the truth that you would rather see the country our parents built completely destroyed? And of course you have something backing up that percentage right?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 20:54:37 GMT -5
I am talking about the meteor thing. Did they actually air something asking if the meteor was a plot by President Obama? www.laughterhub.org/fox-news
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 20:53:16 GMT -5
I am talking about the meteor thing. Did they actually air something asking if the meteor was a plot by President Obama? www.laughterhub.org/fox-news
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 20:47:54 GMT -5
You really have no compassion. You really don't think we, as the richest nation in the world, can find room to provide the most needy among us with a modern means of communication? Imagine trying to get a job and trying the interviewer you don't have a phone so you will check back the next day to se if you were hired. Bet you don't need to check back the next day at all. We can and should help those that need it. Unfortunately, there are those that well abuse it. How much do we spend on this anyways? Do you really think most of those phones are being used to set up job interviews? The phones cost 2.2 billion last year and half the people who got them shouldn't have. www.newsmax.com/US/obama-phone-costs-billions/2013/02/12/id/490022And you know for a fact over half of them should not have gotten the phones. And I do believe it's the companies that donate the phones and the airtime. They get a tax write off I do believe.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 20:12:01 GMT -5
The battle is lost and "the ship be sinkin". Those that believe in personal responsibility and hard work are now out numbered. The sad thing Chucky is that many of these people are well-intentioned fools who feel guilty that they have more than someone else, but they never seem to understand human nature and how subsidizing only leads to more unmet needs. At a very basic level, fear of true starvation is a powerful motivation to get off your backside. Why is it that people like you seem to think President Obama is the one who started this phone program? You do know it's been around way longer then he's been President right?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 19:58:33 GMT -5
no it's not. but it's humane. having phone service is not a luxury.... it's a ness. esp when one is old, disabled, ect. too bad so sad you don't or cannot see it in that way. Who made YOU the arbiter of what's "humane"? Especially when it comes to other people's tax dollars? You and RK can pony up and create an unwed mother's baby daddy crack dealing phone service, but leave me out of it! I am not so sure about the internet. I really think that is a luxury. Now if someone is disabled or the elderly, they do need a way to be able to call if there is an emergency.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 19:24:24 GMT -5
So what did you libs think? Probably "wow, I wish I lived there where gays could have gay rights". Right? What are you doing looking at the site in the first place?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 13:16:09 GMT -5
More like thinking "Why would barry be searching for something about gaypride parades". Trying to tell us something Barry? No, I did it for you libs as a favor. So thank me.SURE you did Barry. What ever you say.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 13:11:28 GMT -5
They why did you say people on welfare should be forced to be sterilized? That's eugenics. To bring out the issues of eugenics and abortion for discussion. Then you may want to be a little more clear. Because you look like you do support eugenics by claiming people on welfare need to be sterilized.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 13:05:58 GMT -5
So, you believe in eugenics? No however Roe vs Wade made the new retroactive Eugenics possible to all women. They why did you say people on welfare should be forced to be sterilized? That's eugenics.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 13:04:25 GMT -5
Bet some of the tards said "oh, wow. let me write this down". More like thinking "Why would barry be searching for something about gaypride parades". Trying to tell us something Barry?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 13:01:24 GMT -5
It was certainly provocative and unpopular, but not a solution with merit from any point of view. I'm just happy you wouldn't actually advocate for something so heinous. Eugenics became an academic discipline at many colleges and universities, and received funding from many sources. Three International Eugenics Conferences presented a global venue for eugenicists with meetings in 1912 in London, and in 1921 and 1932 in New York. Eugenic policies were first implemented in the early 1900s in the United States. Later, in the 1920s and 30s, the eugenic policy of sterilizing certain mental patients was implemented in a variety of other countries, including Belgium, Brazil, Canada, and Sweden, among others. The scientific reputation of eugenics started to decline in the 1930s, a time when Ernst Rüdin used eugenics as a justification for the racial policies of Nazi Germany, and when proponents of eugenics among scientists and thinkers prompted a backlash in the public. Nevertheless, in Sweden the eugenics program continued until 1975. So, you believe in eugenics?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 12:45:14 GMT -5
It's an example Evil. I am sure there are some cons on here consider President Obama guilty even before all the evidence has come in. There are Cons on here that will not even consider that the Republicans could be guilty in the Benghazi thing. They won't even mention the fact that the Republicans stopped funding for the smaller embassies. And that is the reason there was no security at Benghazi. Chek, why don't you attempt to answer the questions posed by Toshiyuki's EXCELLENT post on this issue before you go any further: www.aibafs.freeforums.net/thread/4930/100-fact-obama-proves-ignoranceI DARE YOU Because I have him on ignore where he will remain.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 12:43:45 GMT -5
OBAMAPHONE??? how CONvenient to call it that... how many people call it THAT out of ignorance? i wonder which fox news talking head PUNDIT coined that phrase only to have little dittosheep accept it as fact? it wasn't obama that started that program... but ronny reagan. AND clinton expanded it... AND in 2008, under bush it expanded even further to include cell phones. it's a FEDERAL program in place LONG b4 obama was even in politics. bet you & lotsa people didn't realize that...hence the name obama attached to it. www.snopes.com/politics/taxes/cellphone.aspTell her that. That phone program has been around way longer the President Obama has been President.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 12:14:39 GMT -5
I am sure Fox for example has made up their minds that President Obama is guilty. What does that have to do with anything you and I have mentioned on this topic? False equivalency is really rampant around here. Someone should now chime in with a "but, but Boooosh!". It's an example Evil. I am sure there are some cons on here consider President Obama guilty even before all the evidence has come in. There are Cons on here that will not even consider that the Republicans could be guilty in the Benghazi thing. They won't even mention the fact that the Republicans stopped funding for the smaller embassies. And that is the reason there was no security at Benghazi.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 12:10:00 GMT -5
There is without question so shady business going on here that should be investigated. Part of the investigation needs to be finding out if the Republicans altered the quotes or are the ones released by the White House the revised version. I notice CBS has made up their mind that the GOP version is the revised one, but there's no way they could know that yet. I am sure Fox for example has made up their minds that President Obama is guilty.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 19, 2013 11:59:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 17, 2013 12:10:30 GMT -5
I'm sorry I keep forgetting that you Libs feel you are above common courtesy. Also I only took Alan West's record as my seeing him as a war hero. This is that record: "West's awards and decorations include the Bronze Star; Meritorious Service Medal (two Oak Leaf Clusters); Army Commendation Medal (three Oak Leaf Clusters, one Valor Device); Army Achievement Medal (one Oak Leaf Cluster); Valorous Unit Award; Air Assault Badge; and the Master Parachutist Badge.[3][11]" (Didn't bother adding a link as it is taken from the source I quoted earlier. You'd have seen the list of honors had you read the article I posted.) Speaking of common courtesy, if you wanted links, you could have asked nicely instead of making snide remarks. West was CONVICTED of violating the UCMJ. He abused prisoners. That ain't my idea of a war hero. You do know you better add a link to that statement right? Or you will be called a liar or something else.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 17, 2013 11:49:03 GMT -5
Amazing that it was so simple and yet Brookboy was unable to add a link to his statement. He also (and you) neglected to also add that Alan West is a decorated war hero en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_%28politician%29 (see how simple that was ) You confuse not adding a link with inability to add a link. Quite the "war hero" " West was charged with violating articles 128 (assault) and 134 (general article) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice. During a hearing held as part of an Article 32 investigation in November 2003, West stated, "I know the method I used was not right, but I wanted to take care of my soldiers." The charges were ultimately referred to an Article 15 proceeding rather than court-martial, at which West was fined $5,000." en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Allen_West_(politician)Do all your "war heroes" violate the UCMJ? It wouldn't have mattered if he did add a link. She wouldn't believe it anyway. And what does him being a war hero or whatever have to do with him calling people communists?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 17, 2013 11:26:13 GMT -5
Did he? Can you prove that statement? I thought someone has you on ignore?
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 17, 2013 11:22:52 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 17, 2013 9:53:43 GMT -5
because its her fault he cheats, says Pat Robertson.---http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325542/Pat-Robertson-cheating-Evangelist-tells-woman-grateful-husband.html Robertson is a joke any more. I use to watch and support the 700 club. That is until his crack about how the US deserved 9/11 because of homosexuals. He is loosing his mind.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 16, 2013 12:53:42 GMT -5
Good grief, have you been living in a cave for the last 13 years? I remember all those 'incidents' and the way it was accepted as great leadership by Bush/Cheney by the pundits and people on message boards about like you. Yes, the writer does include some of his own opinion, but the article is based on facts. Barry is such a partisan stooge that in his view, Republicans are saints who can do no wrong and Democrats are evil criminals. He has no clue that they're both same, that is, the latter description. People like Barry wear rose colored glasses.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 14, 2013 11:57:55 GMT -5
How's that, because he's black? When it's a white shooter that's all you see here. So what we have here is an oBOWma supporting negro. I didn't say you were wrong I was just taking a educated guess at why, I happen to agree most likely if he has a politic point of view he does support Obama Then I guess John Wayne Gacy and Jeffery Dahmer were registered Republicans.
|
|
|
Post by cheknurpulse on May 14, 2013 11:35:34 GMT -5
You are basing your statement that he's an Obama supporter on what? I think he is basing it on skin color More then likely.
|
|