Post by bob0627 on Nov 20, 2013 9:32:51 GMT -5
On November 1, 2013, a complaint was filed with the New Jersey State Commission of Investigation.
By David R. Meiswinkle, Attorney at Law
Highlights:
New Jersey has legal jurisdiction for the events of 9/11
a. 681 New Jersey victims, including thirty seven New York and New Jersey Port Authority officers
b. Seventeen of twenty one counties in New Jersey had victims.
c. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey owned the World Trade Center complex.
d. Commercial airliner was hijacked out of Newark, New Jersey.
e. Anthrax attacks were in Princeton and Hamilton, New Jersey.
f. Alleged terrorists lived, trained, and conspired in New Jersey.
Formal Complaint for 9/11 investigation in New Jersey
The 9/11 Commission through its Executive Director Philip Zelikow and the National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) through is lead investigators Shyam Sunder and John Gross appear to have generated reports which obstructed a true investigation into the events of 9/11. If their actions to mislead are intentional they amount to fraud and criminal obstruction of justice, if not, they are a product of gross negligence. New Jersey can do better investigating these terrible events. The State of New Jersey through its Constitution and laws has the jurisdiction and legal right to investigate crimes that affect its citizens and property. The 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution grants that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Federal government reports by the 9/11 Commission and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) do not appear to be trustworthy. Therefore, it is necessary that the State governments conduct their own investigation if truth and justice is to be realized and our country healed.
A. The 9/11 Commission obstructed justice when they failed to call or subpoena key witnesses who had direct and relevant information, pertaining to 9/11, to testify under oath and create an official record, and when they failed to include relevant testimony given, into the official record, thereby creating an adverse inference of bad faith on part of the Federal government. The testimony of these witnesses should be taken, under oath, or their existing written or otherwise recorded testimony be acknowledged, analyzed, investigated, and included in any official record
(list of 68 key witnesses and descriptions for each)
B. The 9/11 Commission obstructed an investigation when they failed to compel the production of essential items of discovery, and failed to subpoena and demand release.
(list of 25 issues)
C. The 9/11 Commission Report failed to hold government officials accountable for obstruction of evidence and or gross negligence:
(list of 12 points)
D. The 9/11 Commission and NIST failed to consider an alternative hypothesis to fire in the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 which appear as the least likely hypothesis.
1. A steel framed high-rise building has never collapsed in the history of fires except on 9/11, because office fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel even if airplane fuel is involved there is still over 1,000 degree Fahrenheit difference in the 9/11 fires. On 9/11 three giant buildings collapsed, and one was not struck by an airplane. No other hypothesis appears to have been entertained.
E. The 9/11 Commission and NIST obstructed an investigation into the causes of the collapse of WTC and WTC 7 when they failed to test for explosions and to consider controlled demolition as a viable hypothesis to the collapse of WTC complex and WTC 7 which appears as the most viable hypothesis for the collapse
(list of 4 points)
F. The NIST Report obstructed an investigation into their cause of WTC 7 collapse as fire when they omitted from their analysis safeguard mechanisms which existed on the building, and which would have prevented a collapse by fire.
(list of 5 points)
G. The 9/11 Commision Failed to properly investigate the Pentagon attack
(list of 29 points)
H. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Properly investigate Flight 93
(list of 11 points)
I. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Follow the Money but stated that who financed the 9/11 events was not of particular significance, which is indicative of obstruction of justice and or gross negligence.
(list of 3 points)
J. The 9/11 Commission Failed to objectively consider all possible Suspects besides the 19 alleged Muslims said to have died in the airplane crashes although, reportedly, 8 turned up alive, and the reluctance to consider other persons of interest and or all possible suspects amounts to obstruction of justice if intentional and or gross negligence, and renders the federal reports useless as investigatory documents. (should be questioned under oath and cross examination.)
A proper investigation is conducted with an open mind and also looks to individuals and or organizations which had the motive, power and opportunity to commit the crime. The following individuals and or organizations should have come under the scrutiny of the 9/11 Commission.
(list of 19 points)
K. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Investi gate Reported Explosions in WTC 6
(list of 2 points)
L. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Investigate Reported Explosions in WTC 4
(list of 2 points)
M. The 9/11 Commission Failed to examine the anthrax attacks in New Jersey and on Democrat United States Senators Patrick Lehey and Tom Daschale.
Prominent DC attorney Barry Kissen has become an expert researcher on the anthrax attacks
O. The 9/11 Commission failed to examine the mysterious death of Democratic United States Senator Paul Wellstone in October 2002 (who opposed the invasion of Iraq) in a suspicious airplane crash a few weeks before the November election and shortly before the Iraqi invasion began, as a possible retaliation, possibly from the above named suspects who may have been involved in the 9/11 crimes. Weapons of mass destruction, used as a pretext to invade Iraq, home of the second largest oil reserve in the world, were never found.
Sen. Paul Wellstone
The untruths which brought our nation into two terrible, lengthy, devastating and, for some, very profitable wars, of which 9/11 was used as a pretext, should and must be investigated as a possible motive for insider involvement in the biggest crime of our nation’s history, that of 9/11.
Based on my research and to the best of my knowledge, I David R. Meiswinkle, hereby affirm that the information contained in this document is accurate.
(pages of research notes, references and links)
nj911aware.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NJ911AwareLEGALDOCUMENTSCIFINAL.pdf
By David R. Meiswinkle, Attorney at Law
Highlights:
New Jersey has legal jurisdiction for the events of 9/11
a. 681 New Jersey victims, including thirty seven New York and New Jersey Port Authority officers
b. Seventeen of twenty one counties in New Jersey had victims.
c. Port Authority of New York and New Jersey owned the World Trade Center complex.
d. Commercial airliner was hijacked out of Newark, New Jersey.
e. Anthrax attacks were in Princeton and Hamilton, New Jersey.
f. Alleged terrorists lived, trained, and conspired in New Jersey.
Formal Complaint for 9/11 investigation in New Jersey
The 9/11 Commission through its Executive Director Philip Zelikow and the National Institute of Standards and Technology(NIST) through is lead investigators Shyam Sunder and John Gross appear to have generated reports which obstructed a true investigation into the events of 9/11. If their actions to mislead are intentional they amount to fraud and criminal obstruction of justice, if not, they are a product of gross negligence. New Jersey can do better investigating these terrible events. The State of New Jersey through its Constitution and laws has the jurisdiction and legal right to investigate crimes that affect its citizens and property. The 10th Amendment of the United States Constitution grants that powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. Federal government reports by the 9/11 Commission and the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) do not appear to be trustworthy. Therefore, it is necessary that the State governments conduct their own investigation if truth and justice is to be realized and our country healed.
A. The 9/11 Commission obstructed justice when they failed to call or subpoena key witnesses who had direct and relevant information, pertaining to 9/11, to testify under oath and create an official record, and when they failed to include relevant testimony given, into the official record, thereby creating an adverse inference of bad faith on part of the Federal government. The testimony of these witnesses should be taken, under oath, or their existing written or otherwise recorded testimony be acknowledged, analyzed, investigated, and included in any official record
(list of 68 key witnesses and descriptions for each)
B. The 9/11 Commission obstructed an investigation when they failed to compel the production of essential items of discovery, and failed to subpoena and demand release.
(list of 25 issues)
C. The 9/11 Commission Report failed to hold government officials accountable for obstruction of evidence and or gross negligence:
(list of 12 points)
D. The 9/11 Commission and NIST failed to consider an alternative hypothesis to fire in the collapse of the Twin Towers and WTC 7 which appear as the least likely hypothesis.
1. A steel framed high-rise building has never collapsed in the history of fires except on 9/11, because office fires cannot burn hot enough to melt steel even if airplane fuel is involved there is still over 1,000 degree Fahrenheit difference in the 9/11 fires. On 9/11 three giant buildings collapsed, and one was not struck by an airplane. No other hypothesis appears to have been entertained.
E. The 9/11 Commission and NIST obstructed an investigation into the causes of the collapse of WTC and WTC 7 when they failed to test for explosions and to consider controlled demolition as a viable hypothesis to the collapse of WTC complex and WTC 7 which appears as the most viable hypothesis for the collapse
(list of 4 points)
F. The NIST Report obstructed an investigation into their cause of WTC 7 collapse as fire when they omitted from their analysis safeguard mechanisms which existed on the building, and which would have prevented a collapse by fire.
(list of 5 points)
G. The 9/11 Commision Failed to properly investigate the Pentagon attack
(list of 29 points)
H. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Properly investigate Flight 93
(list of 11 points)
I. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Follow the Money but stated that who financed the 9/11 events was not of particular significance, which is indicative of obstruction of justice and or gross negligence.
(list of 3 points)
J. The 9/11 Commission Failed to objectively consider all possible Suspects besides the 19 alleged Muslims said to have died in the airplane crashes although, reportedly, 8 turned up alive, and the reluctance to consider other persons of interest and or all possible suspects amounts to obstruction of justice if intentional and or gross negligence, and renders the federal reports useless as investigatory documents. (should be questioned under oath and cross examination.)
A proper investigation is conducted with an open mind and also looks to individuals and or organizations which had the motive, power and opportunity to commit the crime. The following individuals and or organizations should have come under the scrutiny of the 9/11 Commission.
(list of 19 points)
K. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Investi gate Reported Explosions in WTC 6
(list of 2 points)
L. The 9/11 Commission Failed to Investigate Reported Explosions in WTC 4
(list of 2 points)
M. The 9/11 Commission Failed to examine the anthrax attacks in New Jersey and on Democrat United States Senators Patrick Lehey and Tom Daschale.
Prominent DC attorney Barry Kissen has become an expert researcher on the anthrax attacks
O. The 9/11 Commission failed to examine the mysterious death of Democratic United States Senator Paul Wellstone in October 2002 (who opposed the invasion of Iraq) in a suspicious airplane crash a few weeks before the November election and shortly before the Iraqi invasion began, as a possible retaliation, possibly from the above named suspects who may have been involved in the 9/11 crimes. Weapons of mass destruction, used as a pretext to invade Iraq, home of the second largest oil reserve in the world, were never found.
Sen. Paul Wellstone
The untruths which brought our nation into two terrible, lengthy, devastating and, for some, very profitable wars, of which 9/11 was used as a pretext, should and must be investigated as a possible motive for insider involvement in the biggest crime of our nation’s history, that of 9/11.
Based on my research and to the best of my knowledge, I David R. Meiswinkle, hereby affirm that the information contained in this document is accurate.
(pages of research notes, references and links)
nj911aware.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/NJ911AwareLEGALDOCUMENTSCIFINAL.pdf