|
Post by shred on Nov 20, 2013 7:02:26 GMT -5
Paul Neal smelt Jet A1 fuel as it spilled down the lift shafts just after the impact. Eyewitnesses reported fireballs from lift cars. The explosion in the lobby was seen to come from a lift car. Lauren Manning was standing near the lift doors. No load bearing structure was damaged by the explosion in the lobby. Jet fuel is explosive in vapour form. Fuel oils are sometimes used in thermobaric weapons. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thermobaric_weaponThe Jet fuel acted the same way in the lobby. So, idiot, you've lost the argument (again).
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Nov 20, 2013 7:56:52 GMT -5
"So, idiot, you've lost the argument (again)."
Actually no, once you resort to name calling, you admit you have no argument (again). No one said there was no jet fuel, in fact, there had to be. The controversy is what caused the explosion(s) in the WTC lobby. There is NO proven evidence that it was caused by jet fuel and in fact, all the evidence shows that it's very unlikely if not impossible that it was caused by jet fuel.
There is never one single post from you where you consider any possibility other than the one you were fed. There is never one single post from you where you question anything about the official narrative. The sheer volume of contradictions/discrepancies/controversies posted in this forum is massive. If you didn't have an agenda, I would say you're a complete blithering fool for accepting everything you've been fed as true and failing to do either or both.
You're a fool for even pretending the subject of 9/11 is some kind of contest to win or lose. Anyone who fails to consider any possibility other than the one fed by government and the MSM is a complete fool. But you can take comfort in knowing there are millions who do, even if they are a minority.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Nov 20, 2013 12:40:24 GMT -5
No, just a statement of fact.
The the oxygen in the lobby increased the rate of combustion of the burning jet fuel when the lift doors opened. Simple.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Nov 20, 2013 13:32:41 GMT -5
No, just a statement of fact. The the oxygen in the lobby increased the rate of combustion of the burning jet fuel when the lift doors opened. Simple. Or an explosive device went off in the lobby. Even simpler simpleton.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Nov 20, 2013 17:29:03 GMT -5
No so it must be you right after you're done smoking your crack pipe. What happened to putting me on ignore Toshi? Same fake liar as Shred, no wonder you're in love with each other.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Nov 22, 2013 5:17:19 GMT -5
LOL you're the liar and have been exposed as such many times. The fireballs from the lifts could only have come from vapourised burning jet fuel meeting increased oxygen.
Get a life you fraud.
|
|
|
Post by shred on Nov 22, 2013 5:25:56 GMT -5
Or an explosive device went off in the lobby. Even simpler simpleton. LOL where's your evidence that it was a bomb ? And for what reason would they risk it moron ? There had been a plane crash above. There was no need for bombs. The only bits of the twin towers still standing after collapse, were the ground floor columns and the buildings collapsed top down failing at the points of impact not the lobby. The fireball came straight out of the lift doors. Some people who had been in the lifts were completely burned by jet fuel. Burning jet fuel was in the lift shafts and in vapour form is explosive. Go figure, moron.
|
|
|
Post by bob0627 on Nov 22, 2013 8:07:33 GMT -5
"where's your evidence that it was a bomb ?"
Where's YOUR evidence that is was caused by jet fuel? Oh that's right, it's what you were fed. All your claims about 9/11 are exactly what you were fed no matter whether they make any sense or not, as has been clearly demonstrated in this specific case (as they are with all your parroted claims).
"And for what reason would they risk it moron ?"
I see all your posts this morning resort to name calling. It's a clear sign you're terrified that your fakery is not working. When did it ever?
|
|