|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 10:54:59 GMT -5
As it relates to CO2 production, they are perfectly natural and as God intended. The more normal people breed (that excludes you) the more CO2 will be produced, and the greater the crop yields will be. See how that works? Since God designed the anus as an exit, using it as an entrance or a food tray is unnatural - capice? Yes, man exhales CO2 and that is perfectly natural. Your God intended us to burn fossil fuels but not to harness wind and sun? Well my God says that his intention was just the opposite so you're the one that's advocating for something unnatural while I advocate for something natural. See how that works, Billy Bob? Anal sex is more prevalent in the heterosexual world than the homosexual world. There's an entire category of porn dedicated to heterosexual anal sex. I don't declare it to be natural or unnatural. I just know it's the individual's choice to make. You being an uneducated, mentally-ill, authoritarian think that you get to declare what is and what isn't natural. It's part of your sickness. "Anal sex is more prevalent in the heterosexual world than the homosexual world." What? How does that possibly make sense since normal people have the option of regular vaginal sex and homosexuals don't.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 10:59:51 GMT -5
Yes, man exhales CO2 and that is perfectly natural. Your God intended us to burn fossil fuels but not to harness wind and sun? Well my God says that his intention was just the opposite so you're the one that's advocating for something unnatural while I advocate for something natural. See how that works, Billy Bob? Anal sex is more prevalent in the heterosexual world than the homosexual world. There's an entire category of porn dedicated to heterosexual anal sex. I don't declare it to be natural or unnatural. I just know it's the individual's choice to make. You being an uneducated, mentally-ill, authoritarian think that you get to declare what is and what isn't natural. It's part of your sickness. "Anal sex is more prevalent in the heterosexual world than the homosexual world." What? How does that possibly make sense since normal people have the option of regular vaginal sex and homosexuals don't. Kinky Heterosexuals.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:01:21 GMT -5
"Anal sex is more prevalent in the heterosexual world than the homosexual world." What? How does that possibly make sense since normal people have the option of regular vaginal sex and homosexuals don't. Kinky Heterosexuals. The claim doesn't make sense where did you find these studies?
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 5, 2014 11:04:32 GMT -5
The claim doesn't make sense where did you find these studies? Read them years ago when a Kensch made the claim and I challenged him on it. It doesn't make sense that people think gays getting married cheapens their own marriage and yet they do. Sometimes things just don't make sense.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 5, 2014 11:10:12 GMT -5
The claim doesn't make sense where did you find these studies? Read them years ago when a Kensch made the claim and I challenged him on it. It doesn't make sense that people think gays getting married cheapens their own marriage and yet they do. Sometimes things just don't make sense. More than sometimes.
|
|
|
Post by clusterchuck on Sept 5, 2014 11:22:48 GMT -5
By its very nature, "your energy source - based in the free market" is temporary and short sighted. There is absolutely no question what is now considered "alternative" energy sources will evolve and eventually replace today's standards. Government, especially the methods employed by this stinking rotten administration, isn't the issue. But it certainly raises the noise floor for those resisting the status quo. Addressing evil's comment regarding anal sex, IMO: the back door is an exit only. Again, EVERYTHING is temporary to varying degrees. How many times have the liberals bleated about "peak oil" only to be beaten back by the innovative and technology driven energy industry? There is a time and a place for everything, and abandoning something like coal over psuedoscience is not in our best interest. Your points are totally valid. However, I would suggest "abandoning" anything isn't part of a logical playbook. As emissions are improved, so is energy storage, solar conversion, wind turbines, ETC. The topic isn't binary by any stretch. Thanks to human creativity and science, evolution shall prevail.
|
|