|
Post by psk836 on Sept 4, 2014 10:44:17 GMT -5
Okay, so just to be clear for those that don't know what that word means, you do NOT want to actually kill those responsible for sending these innocent men to prison? Quite correct - by 'gutting and skinning' I mean 'taking these chuckleheads to the cleaners' (oops, another idiom, I'l probablu have to explain THAT one, too) in any civil suit and stripping them bare financially, and if there is any CRIMINAL action (conspiracy, deprivation of civil rights, etc.) that they get appropriate prison time. Tar and feathers.
|
|
|
Post by thelion on Sept 4, 2014 10:47:16 GMT -5
Quite correct - by 'gutting and skinning' I mean 'taking these chuckleheads to the cleaners' (oops, another idiom, I'l probablu have to explain THAT one, too) in any civil suit and stripping them bare financially, and if there is any CRIMINAL action (conspiracy, deprivation of civil rights, etc.) that they get appropriate prison time. Tar and feathers. Literally? or figuratively?
|
|
|
Post by numarymag on Sept 4, 2014 11:19:00 GMT -5
So killing those that you find guilty is okay but not the ones that were found guilty in a court of law? What happened to these men was terrible and obviously they have done the best they can to correct a wrong. Perhaps death sentences should be reviewed by an independent group of legal minds to determine that the sentence was in line with the evidence of guilt. Certainly killing those that found them guilty doesn't help anything. Idiom is completely beyond you. If Toshi or Beau said anything similar it would be a terrible violent comment but it is okay when it comes from Lion or any other Liberal - I got it.
|
|
|
Post by shaniqua on Sept 4, 2014 11:21:53 GMT -5
Idiom is completely beyond you. If Toshi or Beau said anything similar it would be a terrible violent comment but it is okay when it comes from Lion or any other Liberal - I got it. Blind as an old bat.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:27:18 GMT -5
call it what you want. they did what was possible Gutting and skinning the prosecutor and the *investigating* cops would be what is 'possible'. Hmmm a very nazi like idea.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:36:05 GMT -5
Okay, so just to be clear for those that don't know what that word means, you do NOT want to actually kill those responsible for sending these innocent men to prison? Quite correct - by 'gutting and skinning' I mean 'taking these chuckleheads to the cleaners' (oops, another idiom, I'l probablu have to explain THAT one, too) in any civil suit and stripping them bare financially, and if there is any CRIMINAL action (conspiracy, deprivation of civil rights, etc.) that they get appropriate prison time. lol "gutting and skinning" means "taking some one to the cleaners"? lol I would like to see an example of that in print.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:37:45 GMT -5
Idiom is completely beyond you. If Toshi or Beau said anything similar it would be a terrible violent comment but it is okay when it comes from Lion or any other Liberal - I got it. The double standard is laughable. They really like to pick on female senior citizens here.
|
|
|
Post by psk836 on Sept 4, 2014 11:38:36 GMT -5
Literally? or figuratively? I'm afraid to say.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 11:43:40 GMT -5
Quite correct - by 'gutting and skinning' I mean 'taking these chuckleheads to the cleaners' (oops, another idiom, I'l probablu have to explain THAT one, too) in any civil suit and stripping them bare financially, and if there is any CRIMINAL action (conspiracy, deprivation of civil rights, etc.) that they get appropriate prison time. lol "gutting and skinning" means "taking some one to the cleaners"? lol I would like to see an example of that in print. Print out this thread then.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 11:44:44 GMT -5
If Toshi or Beau said anything similar it would be a terrible violent comment but it is okay when it comes from Lion or any other Liberal - I got it. The double standard is laughable. They really like to pick on female senior citizens here. alleged female senior citizens.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:45:15 GMT -5
lol "gutting and skinning" means "taking some one to the cleaners"? lol I would like to see an example of that in print. Print out this thread then. Clearly when I said "in print" I meant a published work.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:46:48 GMT -5
The double standard is laughable. They really like to pick on female senior citizens here. alleged female senior citizens. I guess that makes you an alleged conservative and an alleged non liar. I take her at her word and think she deserves to be respected.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 11:47:39 GMT -5
Print out this thread then. Clearly when I said "in print" I meant a published work. Clearly that wasn't clear. Anyhow, so if it hasn't been published then we can't use terms and phrases in our own way? Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally and for those that it wasn't clear to he clarified it for. Much ado about nothing really.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 11:49:56 GMT -5
alleged female senior citizens. I guess that makes you an alleged conservative and an alleged non liar. I take her at her word and think she deserves to be respected. Yes, and you an alleged open-minded moderate. I think she has shown a complete lack of respect for anyone who dare not agree with her and that excludes her from receiving any respect from me.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:55:05 GMT -5
Clearly when I said "in print" I meant a published work. Clearly that wasn't clear. Anyhow, so if it hasn't been published then we can't use terms and phrases in our own way? Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally and for those that it wasn't clear to he clarified it for. Much ado about nothing really. "Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally" Yes I thought he meant he wanted them dead too. He said it was an "idiom" if so he should be able to show examples of it meaning to strip some one financially. I don't think it's a big deal though I question whether he was being forthright in explaining his initial emotional response.
|
|
|
Post by chuckygotlucky on Sept 4, 2014 11:57:28 GMT -5
I guess that makes you an alleged conservative and an alleged non liar. I take her at her word and think she deserves to be respected. Yes, and you an alleged open-minded moderate. I think she has shown a complete lack of respect for anyone who dare not agree with her and that excludes her from receiving any respect from me. She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal.
|
|
|
Post by numarymag on Sept 4, 2014 12:10:11 GMT -5
Yes, and you an alleged open-minded moderate. I think she has shown a complete lack of respect for anyone who dare not agree with her and that excludes her from receiving any respect from me. She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal. Evil has known me since early years on Yahoo and NOW he is accusing me of being someone other than who I am. He comes out NOW and claims I am not 82 and a woman? Earlier on posts he whined because he "defended me" all those year - now he calls me a liar over the very things he defended me for? Talk about a mixed up personalilty! Chucky I have no problem with anyone who wants to disagree with me politically but to carry it to the lengths that thi small group of Liberals on this board take it is ridiculous. I believe Obama to be the biggest danger that this country has ever faced and he will bring us down if we don't decide who we are as Republicans and Conservatives and nominate someone who upholds those positions. Now disagree with me. I believe the Police officer that shot Brown deserves a fair hearing and trial and I don't think it can happen in that town because I believe that Obama and Holder have already found him guilty and there will be riots nation wide if he is not found guilty. Now disagree with me. I am 82, female and have been posting these boards for over 10 years and 6 years on AOL before that (my current provider does not offer AOL). I have a 53 year old son, a very sweet daughter-in-law and 2 absolutely perfect grandchildren. You don't believe it - prove me a liar.
|
|
|
Post by brookboy123 on Sept 4, 2014 12:16:02 GMT -5
She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal. Evil has known me since early years on Yahoo and NOW he is accusing me of being someone other than who I am. He comes out NOW and claims I am not 82 and a woman? Earlier on posts he whined because he "defended me" all those year - now he calls me a liar over the very things he defended me for? Talk about a mixed up personalilty! Chucky I have no problem with anyone who wants to disagree with me politically but to carry it to the lengths that thi small group of Liberals on this board take it is ridiculous. I believe Obama to be the biggest danger that this country has ever faced and he will bring us down if we don't decide who we are as Republicans and Conservatives and nominate someone who upholds those positions. Now disagree with me. I believe the Police officer that shot Brown deserves a fair hearing and trial and I don't think it can happen in that town because I believe that Obama and Holder have already found him guilty and there will be riots nation wide if he is not found guilty. Now disagree with me. I am 82, female and have been posting these boards for over 10 years and 6 years on AOL before that (my current provider does not offer AOL). I have a 53 year old son, a very sweet daughter-in-law and 2 absolutely perfect grandchildren. You don't believe it - prove me a liar. annie-mac, in the spirit of board peace, I want to thank you for refraining from referencing my family as "garbage" during the last few months. thank you. I knew you would respond to my civility in due time.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:20:45 GMT -5
Clearly that wasn't clear. Anyhow, so if it hasn't been published then we can't use terms and phrases in our own way? Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally and for those that it wasn't clear to he clarified it for. Much ado about nothing really. "Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally" Yes I thought he meant he wanted them dead too. He said it was an "idiom" if so he should be able to show examples of it meaning to strip some one financially. I don't think it's a big deal though I question whether he was being forthright in explaining his initial emotional response. You do recognize the typo, yes? I didn't see an emotional response, but this wouldn't be the first time you assigned emotions to someone that wasn't experiencing them.
|
|
|
Post by numarymag on Sept 4, 2014 12:21:50 GMT -5
Why am I not surprised that you would show up with yet another of your old lies? You should not be posting here.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:22:50 GMT -5
Yes, and you an alleged open-minded moderate. I think she has shown a complete lack of respect for anyone who dare not agree with her and that excludes her from receiving any respect from me. She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal. She is not civil, but I agree that if she wants respect then she needs to give it. She and I have disagreed in the past without issue, but all of sudden she decides to call me "nasty" and "perverse" when I hadn't even said anything to her. I don't get personal until the other party does. <shrugs>
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:28:11 GMT -5
She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal. Evil has known me since early years on Yahoo and NOW he is accusing me of being someone other than who I am. He comes out NOW and claims I am not 82 and a woman? Earlier on posts he whined because he "defended me" all those year - now he calls me a liar over the very things he defended me for? Talk about a mixed up personalilty! Chucky I have no problem with anyone who wants to disagree with me politically but to carry it to the lengths that thi small group of Liberals on this board take it is ridiculous. I believe Obama to be the biggest danger that this country has ever faced and he will bring us down if we don't decide who we are as Republicans and Conservatives and nominate someone who upholds those positions. Now disagree with me. I believe the Police officer that shot Brown deserves a fair hearing and trial and I don't think it can happen in that town because I believe that Obama and Holder have already found him guilty and there will be riots nation wide if he is not found guilty. Now disagree with me. I am 82, female and have been posting these boards for over 10 years and 6 years on AOL before that (my current provider does not offer AOL). I have a 53 year old son, a very sweet daughter-in-law and 2 absolutely perfect grandchildren. You don't believe it - prove me a liar. Where did I claim you are not 82 and a woman? Why do you have to keep lying about me? I did defend you in the past despite your nasty attacks on others because I felt in some cases you were being unfairly ganged up on. When you decided to attack me personally for no good reason I decided that you get what you deserve. It's not a "mixed up personality." It's just me seeing the error of my ways. The "liberals" here are no worse than the "conservatives." You get as nasty as anyone. I believe your book refers to that as a "plank." I agree with you about the Ferguson issue. I hope your alleged family stays happy and healthy.
|
|
|
Post by numarymag on Sept 4, 2014 12:29:46 GMT -5
Exactly as expected arrives Evil with his "I'm never wrong" defense.
|
|
|
Post by brookboy123 on Sept 4, 2014 12:30:35 GMT -5
Why am I not surprised that you would show up with yet another of your old lies? You should not be posting here. Why?.....I follow all the rules. ...and again, I want to thank you for apparently giving up that awful tact to anger me......thank you for not referencing my children and parents as "garbage" like you have many times in the past. I remember back on Yahoo that I responded to your posts with that anger. I called you some awful names back in the Yahoo days. I'm glad we have both moved on from such incivility. Enjoy the last weeks of summer, annie-mac.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:39:15 GMT -5
Exactly as expected arrives Evil with his "I'm never wrong" defense. Says the "woman" that has lied about me twice and both times withered at the opportunity to prove her assertions about me. I am wrong and I always admit it when I am. You on the other hand just get nastier when it is shown you are wrong.
|
|
|
Post by numarymag on Sept 4, 2014 12:42:39 GMT -5
You are off topic Evil - this is a political board and I have nothing to say to you unless you want to discuss politics. I will not be part of your nasty and perverse ways.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:43:52 GMT -5
Very interesting to find out that you and Shanniqua think that Beau wanting to "exterminate" (Shanniqua's term) people he believes are destroying this country should be sent packing yet it is okay for Lion to advocate "gutting and skinning" those that he felt are responsible for this bad, bad turn of justice which would most certainly cause their deaths. (BTW wouldn't that include the jury? Your warped sense of right and wrong certainly gives one pause. So let's ask the question again, where did I ever say that I wanted to send "Beau" packing and that it's okay for Lion to advocate killing anyone? Here's your chance to admit you were wrong or prove that I said anything of the sort.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:44:51 GMT -5
You are off topic Evil - this is a political board and I have nothing to say to you unless you want to discuss politics. I will not be part of your nasty and perverse ways. Typical.
|
|
|
Post by evilconempire on Sept 4, 2014 12:46:57 GMT -5
She is civil and if you want respect you need to give it and be an example to others. I don't agree with her on several issues and have no problems with her because I don't get personal. Evil has known me since early years on Yahoo and NOW he is accusing me of being someone other than who I am. He comes out NOW and claims I am not 82 and a woman? Earlier on posts he whined because he "defended me" all those year - now he calls me a liar over the very things he defended me for? Talk about a mixed up personalilty! Chucky I have no problem with anyone who wants to disagree with me politically but to carry it to the lengths that thi small group of Liberals on this board take it is ridiculous. I believe Obama to be the biggest danger that this country has ever faced and he will bring us down if we don't decide who we are as Republicans and Conservatives and nominate someone who upholds those positions. Now disagree with me. I believe the Police officer that shot Brown deserves a fair hearing and trial and I don't think it can happen in that town because I believe that Obama and Holder have already found him guilty and there will be riots nation wide if he is not found guilty. Now disagree with me. I am 82, female and have been posting these boards for over 10 years and 6 years on AOL before that (my current provider does not offer AOL). I have a 53 year old son, a very sweet daughter-in-law and 2 absolutely perfect grandchildren. You don't believe it - prove me a liar. I'll ask again, where did I ever say you are not a 82 year old woman? this is another chance for you to admit you're wrong, but as usual you will not. Perhaps I am truly insane as I keep doing the same thing here and expecting a different result.
|
|
|
Post by thelion on Sept 4, 2014 13:10:10 GMT -5
Clearly when I said "in print" I meant a published work. Clearly that wasn't clear. Anyhow, so if it hasn't been published then we can't use terms and phrases in our own way? Seemed clear to me that he was speaking literally and for those that it wasn't clear to he clarified it for. Much ado about nothing really. Ntice the obvious effort spent to hijack the thread away from prosecutorial misconduct. Why are (some) posters so hellbent on defending this psycho prosecutor, anyway? Is he a Republican or something?
|
|